Dear Editor,
I was bothered by the recent statements made by Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo concerning the delay of the natural gas pipeline and its implications for the completion of the 300-Megawatt power station.
In his recent remarks, Vice President Jagdeo outright placed the blame on Exxon for the delay of the natural gas pipeline, suggesting that this setback would consequently push out the completion date of the power station to December 2025. Furthermore, the timing of his comments seems to insinuate that Exxon’s actions could be politically motivated, especially given the upcoming general elections are scheduled in August 2025. Moreover, a story has two sides, and therefore warrants a timely rebuttal from Exxon.
Such statements are not only intriguing but also warrant further investigation and clarification. The completion of the natural gas pipeline and the subsequent operation of the power station are crucial for the energy security and economic development of Guyana. Any delays or hindrances in these projects could have significant hardship for Guyanese as they continue to suffer from frequent and lengthy power outages as well as serious repercussions for the country’s progress.
Therefore, it is imperative that members of the public receive clear and accurate information regarding the status and progress of infrastructure projects, like the natural gas power station, which directly impact their lives and livelihoods. For this reason, I advise the relevant authorities to provide comprehensive real time updates on the status of the natural gas pipeline and the measures being taken to address any delays or challenges, including employing additional resources to get back on track.
In conclusion, it is essential for all parties involved to work collaboratively and responsibly towards the timely completion of the natural gas pipeline and the power station, without succumbing to political agendas or disruptions. The future of Guyana’s energy sector and its overall development depend on the effective management and execution of such critical projects.
Sincerely,
Keith Bernard